Foreman February, the prisoner had struck the deceased some severe blows the head.
Order a paper online
A fortnight later, having partially recovered, another man gave him some severe blows the head. A fortnight later still had left hemiplegia, and died a few days later a large abscess in the brain.
The question arose which set blows had been the cause the abscess.
The prisoner, the first assailant, was acquitted, as the deceased had had no serious symptoms until the second assault, and there was no satisfactory medical can t write my essay evidence as the relation the two assaults the abscess formation. The same author also supposes the following case A man having received a gunshot wound the shoulder doing well, when in another quarrel receives a penetrating stab wound the thorax and abdo Taylor Medical Jurisprudence. men.
He dies after lingering for a timo, under the effects of these wounds.
If the wound the shoulder could proven the cause death, the second assailant could not convicted manslaughter, and too with the first assailant if could shown that the victim died the stab-wound. It might possible for a surgeon decide the question definiteh at once if death occurred soon after the stab, which was found have penetrated professional custom essays the heart, a large blood-vessel, or one the viscera the other hand, if the stab wound was found to superficial and not penetrating, and the wound how to write my paper in the shoulder had suppurated and caused septicemia.
Buy student research paper
In either or any case, everything would depend upon the evidence furnished the medical witness. His knowledge and judgment are required distinguish the guilty from the Again, sometimes death may appear equally the result either or both wounds, in which case, as far as the medical evidence goes, both assailants would liable the charge of manslaughter.
Or the second wound may accidental or suicidal, and again the question would arise as the cause of death.
A case illustrating this told Taylor substantially as follows A grocer's assistant pursued a thief, who had stolen from a cart, into a coal-shed, where was stabbed twice in the abdomen.
The larger wound suppurated, the smaller wound healed and the man died peritonitis.
On post-mortem examination the suppurating wound was found not involve a vital part, while the small healed wound had wounded the liver and gall bladder and had set the fatal peritonitis. The large suppurating wound had apparently been inflicted purposely the fatal wound, directed upward and backward, might have been accidental the deceased rushing upon the knife held more or less in self-defence. The case never came trial, as the assailant was never found, but can readih Imagined what complications might have arisen. Furthermore, the wounded person may have taken poison or been subsequently ill-treated, and may have died from these causes rather than the injury. But the question arises as to whether the wound was necessarily the cause death. Here, in order exculpate the assailant, the supervening disease or maltreatment must such as account for sudden or rapid death under the symptoms which actually preceded death. Was Death Due Natural Causes? Again, the injury may admitted, but may claimed that buy an essay death due natural causes. It not unusual for wounded persons die from natural causes, though the case may appear otherwise laymen. This often seen with suicidal wounds, especially those inflicted during the delirium a disease, or pay to write my essay the disease may supervene later and cause death without relation the wound. Where the wound was inflicted another, accurate discrimination especially important in order save the accused from imprisonment under false accusation and consequent loss of character.