A commission merehant in terms, more than a mere agent one party help with writing assignments in making sales, but acts between both in nouducting the business. Slack Tuc-ker, Wall..
In making order, in question, the defendants, the words sold for account Levi Cotton Mills, assumed that there was a sale goods described, upon the terms named, from the plaintiff some purehaser. If there was no other purchaser, they would stand in the place one, and holden, as such, make good their assumption.
College essay service
The order, when accepted, custom college term papers bound the plaintiff furnish the goods, and the defendants take them, for the purchaser they represented they had, or for themselves. If they had one, they were bound produce him if not, stand in his place. They not only did not produce, but withheld knowledge such other principal, if there was one, and thus took, or left themselves in, the place a purchaser, like agents for an undisclosed principal.
Story Agency. The order signed the defendants in their own names, as parties chargea thereby, within the statute frauds.
Their liabillty that the one giving the order which they desired have fiUed, and which acceptance became a contract the plaintiff make, and the defendants take, the goods according the terms the order. There was considerable correspondence about this order besides that quoted, but at no time did the defendants revoke the direct requests July and July llth not start the order until they should advise and matters remained till the peremptory Information September llth that no more would received that order.
After these directions, the plaintiff would not seem have been warranted in proceeding with the manufacture the goods at the expense the defendants nor would waiting for their advices aceordingly, under the circumstances, an abandonment or waiver their rights under the contract The defendants had a right stop the manufacture and take the consequences. This what they appear have preferred.
How to edit an essay
The liabllity for damages for the breach followed. Whether a warrant arrest sufflclently descrlbes the person arrested thereon afiford protection the offieer making the arrest agalnst an action for false Imprisonment a question for the court, where the facts A person's middle name not recognized in law, and the omission of the initial letter such name in a warrant arrest, or a mistake It sufflcient describe a person In a warrant giving the initial book editing service letter his first name instead writing such name in full, especially where ordinarily uses and known the Initial.
English editing service
how to write a phd thesis A warrant commanding the arrest doctor, and reciting the fillng a complaint charging said Cox, late the county Boulder and State Colorado, with having committed a articles writing service crime in such county, and being a fugitive from justice, protects the offieer in the arrest essay editing tips thereon of James Cox, commonly known as Cox, where was the person in fact intended, although was not late sald county nor a fugitive from justice, the description being sufficient, and those being matters to determined his trial, european Surety Company New York, who are the defendants in error. The complaint contained two counts, in one which damages were claimed apparently account the help me write a good thesis abuse or misuse of process, and in the other damages were claimed as for a false imprisonment. The surety company was the surety the officiai bond the marshal, while the other defendant, Morrison, appears have been one the marshal's deputies homework paper writers whp made the arrest hereinafter described. The paper writer online facts which gave rise the controversy appear these In April, a post office at Boulder, Golo. was broken into and robbed. The robber was at first unknown, but afterwards a man who went the name George Rogers was arrested at Lincoln, Neb. for some offense against the postal laws, and while the way jail threw away some papers and checks which were supposed have some bearing or throw some light the robbery previously committed at Boulder. Among the papers thrown away, but subsequently recovered, was an express rnoney order receipt which indicated that the money order was purchased Cox and was payable Cox at a place named Belton. A post office inspecter the name Waters, who was engaged in investigating the robbery at Boulder, Colo. when this receipt came into his hands and certain inquiries had been made with reference thereto persons who were acquainted with Rogers, was led conclude that the real name the man Rogers, who threw the receipt away, Cox, and that had in fact committed the robbery at Botilder.